Cosmopolitan magazine is infamous for giving women horrible sex advice, and now it’s doling out biased, misinformed advice on guns, too. The rag published a mind-numbingly stupid video/article titled, “Why You Should Never Date a ‘Gunsplainer'” (subtitle: “He’ll deny that more guns mean more violence against women”).
Those two headings tell you everything need to know about Cosmopolitan’s warped, disturbingly incorrect view on women and firearms. Luckily, intelligent, pro-Second Amendment women like The Blaze‘s Dana Loesch exist to set the record straight:
Loesch shreds Cosmopolitan’s “never date a gunsplainer” campaign, as insanely condescending, illogical, and inadvertently sexist since the publication pretty much said that women are “too stupid to own or carry” guns. More maddening, as Loesch noted, the women’s magazine took umbrage to National Rifle Association’s Wayne LaPierre’s statement that the “one thing a violent rapist deserves to face is a good woman with a gun.”
“Apparently, women are less valuable than their potential rapist,” said Loesch. “And it’s rapists’ feelings which we should prioritize rather than women’s safety,” she added. She later takes this flawed progressive narrative on guns by saying that it’s a fact that men are stronger than women, which is why she trains and carries a gun. Moreover, she cites a Centers for Disease Control report commissioned by the Obama administration, which shows that there are anywhere from 500,000 to 3.3 million instances of defensive gun use every year. The CDC also said that concealed carry is a great deterrent against crime.
Guns empower women; with proper training they are the best possible deterrent to a potential rapist. How is it that liberals don’t see that?