Clinton Foundation and U.N. Teaming Up for 2030 Agenda

A top level official of the scandal-plagued Clinton Foundation met with the U.N. deputy Secretary-General late last week to discuss the U.N. notorious 2030 Agenda.

Image Credit: Dendodge Public Domain

Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed met Friday with the Clinton Foundation’s director of foreign policy Amitabh Desai. The meeting was first noticed by UN blog Inner City Press, in a one line entry on Mohammed’s schedule.

A spokesman for Secretary-General António Guterres told Breitbart News on Friday that the meeting, which took place at the UN headquarters in New York City, was “part of the ongoing effort to engage and mobilise support from different development partners and stakeholders for the implementation of the 2030 Development Agenda.”

The 2030 Agenda is a series of policy goals the U.N. is maneuvering to impose on as many member states as possible.  They mainly focus on transferring wealth from developed countries like the U.S. to undevelopend countries.

Neither party would discuss the agenda for the meeting but it is believed the subject of funding for the U.N.’s plans was a topic.

When asked further about the meeting, particularly on whether the meeting involved the discussion of donations or financial support, the spokesman’s office said they had no further information. The Clinton Foundation did not respond to multiple requests for comment from Breitbart News. The UN also did not provide a readout of the meeting to the press.

At a press briefing Monday, a spokesman for the Secretary-General, in responding to a question about the meeting, mentioned that the discussion involved how to get “more resources mobilized for… in order to fund the development agenda.” This suggests that at least some of the conversation was about funding.

The Clinton’s have long been associated with U.N. corruption.  A former Chinagate donor to Bill Clinton’s 1996 re-election campaign Ng Lap Seng was caught up in a U.N. bribery scandal.

The former president of the General Assembly accused of taking the bribe from  Seng, John Ashe, also had close contacts with both the Clinton’s and the Obama’s.  Ashe, who was set to stand trial for bribery charges, recently met his demise in what was described as a “conveniently timed” weightlifting accident.

Clearly, the gears of the Clinton Foundation and the U.N.’s drive for world government continue apace.

Rock Solid Proof The DNC Email Leak Was Internal

A new forensic study of the DNC email “hack” has provided strong evidence that the leak came from inside the DNC and was not a product of any Russian interference.

Image Credit: Christoph ScholzCC by SA 2.0

New meta-analysis has emerged from a document published today by an independent researcher known as The Forensicator, which suggests that files eventually published by the Guccifer 2.0 persona were likely initially downloaded by a person with physical access to a computer possibly connected to the internal DNC network. The individual most likely used a USB drive to copy the information. The groundbreaking new analysis irrevocably destroys the Russian hacking narrative, and calls the actions of Crowdstrike and the DNC into question.

The document supplied to Disobedient Media via Adam Carter was authored by an individual known as The Forensicator. The full document referenced here has been published on their blog. Their analysis indicates the data was almost certainly not accessed initially by a remote hacker, much less one in Russia.

The mainstream media and their allies in the Democratic Party have pushed the narrative that the email hack was the work of Russian agents trying to have an impact on the 2016 Presidential election.

This new data basically slams shut the Russian hacking narrative in favor of the one that has been most likely from the beginning . . . that someone at the DNC leaked the emails in retaliation for the DNC’s rigging of the Presidential primary process against Bernie Sanders and for Hillary Clinton.

The evidence provided by the Forensicator is very detailed and paints a clear picture of the route this information took before it ended up with Wikileaks.

The document states that the files that eventually published as “NGP-VAN” by Guccifer 2.0 were first copied to a system located in the Eastern Time Zone, with this conclusion supported by the observation that “the .7z file times, after adjustment to East Coast time fall into the range of the file times in the .rar files.” This constitutes the first of a number of points of analysis which suggests that the information eventually published by the Guccifer 2.0 persona was not obtained by a Russian hacker.

Image via The Forensicator

The Forensicator stated in their analysis that a USB drive was most likely used to boot Linux OS onto a computer that either contained the alleged DNC files or had direct access to them. They also explained to us that in this situation one would simply plug a USB drive with the LinuxOS into a computer and reboot it; after restarting, the computer would boot from the USB drive and load Linux instead of its normal OS. A large amount of data would then be copied to this same USB drive.

In this case, additional files would have been copied en masse, to be “pruned” heavily at a later time when the 7zip archive now known as NGP-VAN was built. The Forensicator wrote that if 1.98 GB of data had been copied at a rate of 22.6 MB/s and time gaps t were noticed at the top level of the NGP-VAN 7zip file were attributed to additional file copying, then approximately 19.3 GB in total would have been copied. In this scenario, the 7zip archive (NGP-VAN) would represent only about 10% of the total amount of data that was collected.

The very small proportion of files eventually selected for use in the creation of the “NGP-VAN” files were later published by the creators of the Guccifer 2.0 persona. This point is especially significant, as it suggests the possibility that up to 90% of the information initially copied was never published.

These seemingly small details ferreted out by the Forensicator add to the veracity of their conclusions that it had to be a local invasion not a remote one.

The use of a USB drive would suggest that the person first accessing the data could not have been a Russian hacker. In this case, the person who copied the files must have physically interacted with a computer that had access to what Guccifer 2.0 called the DNC files. A less likely explanation for this data pattern where large time gaps were observed between top level files and directories
in the 7zip file, can be explained by the use of ‘think time’ to select and copy 1.9 GB of individual files, copied in small batches with think time interspersed. In either scenario, Linux would have been booted from a USB drive, which fundamentally necessitates physical access to a computer with the alleged DNC files.

The Forensicator believed that using the possible ‘think-time’ explanation to explain the time-gaps was a less likely explanation for the data pattern available, with a large amount of data most likely copied instantaneously, later “pruned” in the production of the Guccifer 2.0’s publication of the NGP-VAN files.

It also calls into question the way the DNC handled this situation including its curious use of Crowdstrike, an IT company with strong leftist ties, to be the only ones to see the initial data and then make a conclusion blaming Russian hackers.

Disobedient Media previously reported that Crowdstrike is the only group that has directly analyzed the DNC servers. Other groups including Threat Connect have used the information provided by Crowdstrike to claim that Russians hacked the DNC. However, their evaluation was based solely on information ultimately provided by Crowdstrike; this places the company in the unique position of being the only direct source of evidence that a hack occurred.

The group’s President Shawn Henry is a retired executive assistant director of the FBI while their co-founder and CTO, Dmitri Alperovitch, is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, which as we have reported, is linked to George Soros. Carter has stated on his website that “At present, it looks a LOT like Shawn Henry & Dmitri Alperovitch (CrowdStrike executives), working for either the HRC campaign or DNC leadership were very likely to have been behind the Guccifer 2.0 operation.”

One key leg of the entire Russia conspiracy narrative is now turned completely to dust. It’s not likely to stop the witch hunt against the President but at least this charge is now up in smoke.


Crazy Bernie Goes 9/11 on GOP Obamacare Bill

Crazed old socialist Bernie Sanders, who is already partially responsible for one Congressional shooting thanks to his overheated rhetoric, has dialed it up to 11 with his latest outburst.

Photo: Gage Skidmore (cc by-sa 2.0)

“Now obviously nobody can predict exactly how many people will die if they lose their coverage. Nobody can make that prediction,” Sanders said at a rally in West Virginia on Sunday. “But what experts at the Harvard School of Public Health estimate, is that if 23 million Americans were to be thrown off the insurance they currently have, which is what the House bill would do, up to, up to 28,000 Americans every single year could die.”

The socialist senator proceeded to compare the bill to the September 11th terrorist attacks: “That is nine times more than the tragic losses we suffered on 9/11, every single year.”

Besides the fallacy that lack of government-run health insurance is equal to lack of health care, the Vermont scold also forgets that Obamacare’s rising prices and plummeting health care choices are equally deadly to millions of Americans.

With this latest insane outburst, it’s no wonder crazed Bernie Bro’s resort to violence at the drop of a MAGA hat.

But perhaps Bernie is just trying to deflect attention from the ongoing FBI probe into his shady banking activities.