Establishment Democrats and their allied outside groups dumped a fortune into stopping Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan’s Senate primary. They lost. The numbers are ugly, the timing worse, and the lesson clear: money alone no longer buys Democratic primaries when the activist base has already moved left.
Michigan says no to AIPAC’s money, Whitmer and Schumer backed the loser.
Abdul El-Sayed is the Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan. He beat Representative Haley Stevens by about 1 point after outside groups, most of it pro-Israel money, dumped somewhere around $60 to…
— Eric Blackerby (@EricBlackerby) August 5, 2026
The Price Tag
This was the most expensive Democratic Senate primary in history. Outside groups spent heavily on behalf of Rep. Haley Stevens. The United Democracy Project, the super PAC arm linked to AIPAC, alone put in a record $30.6 million—its largest single-race outlay. Other committees, including A Stronger Michigan and additional centrist and pro-Israel vehicles, added tens of millions more. Total outside spending benefiting Stevens ran well over $50 million in many tallies, with overall race spending crossing $80 million. El-Sayed’s side was outspent by margins reported as high as 9-to-1 on advertising.
Israel AIPAC spent $30 million! The current 10-year Israel memorandum of understanding (2019–28) provides $38 billion for that period. Congress approved additional emergency funding on top of the regular annual aid, making FY2024 an unusually large year. https://t.co/AD7mem3k4K
— BenBeer03 (@BenBeer03) August 6, 2026
El-Sayed’s own campaign raised competitively from small donors and progressive networks, but it could not match the television and digital blitz arrayed against him. The money came from the usual establishment channels and pro-Israel donors determined to block a candidate who openly calls for ending U.S. military aid to Israel and labels the Gaza campaign a genocide.
Ilhan Omar-endorsed Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed accepted $115,000 from members of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.
The United Arab Emirates, Texas, and Florida have designated CAIR as a terrorist organization.
DOJ officials named CAIR an unindicted co-conspirator… pic.twitter.com/xSpED75CDC
— Josh Guillory (@JoshGuilloryUSA) August 5, 2026
Context: A Party Already Underwater
While this cash was being burned in Michigan, the Democratic National Committee sat in poor financial shape. As of the end of June it reported roughly $16.3 million in cash against $18.5 million in debt—effectively underwater—and had taken a large loan using its Washington headquarters as collateral. The Republican National Committee, by contrast, held well over $100 million with no comparable debt. The national party’s anemic position makes the Michigan spending look even more reckless: scarce resources and allied dollars poured into a primary that the base was already prepared to reject.
What Went Wrong
The spending failed for the same reasons big money often fails against motivated primary electorates. El-Sayed turned the outside cash into a weapon. He ran against “AIPAC money” and corporate influence as core campaign themes. In a state with one of the country’s largest Arab-American populations, that message landed. Progressive organizers, Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez endorsements, and online energy from figures on the left supplied volunteers, small-dollar donations, and turnout that television ads could not buy.
Stevens had the institutional endorsements—party leaders, the governor’s orbit, the traditional donor class. She could not overcome the sense among primary voters that she represented the old guard. The race became a referendum on Israel policy and the party’s direction more than a conventional contest over Michigan-specific issues. Heavy negative advertising may even have backfired by reinforcing El-Sayed’s outsider narrative.
This is not an isolated misfire. It follows the pattern of large, inefficient Democratic spending in recent cycles—most notably the massive outlays that failed to elect Kamala Harris. The establishment keeps writing bigger checks for candidates the rising left base no longer wants. The base keeps winning the primaries that matter to it.
The Larger Signal
This is not pure incompetence, though the political judgment is poor. It is the death knell for the assumption that regular, establishment-backed Democrats can still dictate terms inside the party when the energy, organizing, and primary voters have shifted. Outside money can still matter in general elections and in some districts. In Democratic primaries increasingly dominated by activists who view AIPAC, corporate PACs, and centrist leaders as the problem, that money is now a liability as often as an asset.
El-Sayed’s win shows the left can beat the machine in a statewide race in a battleground state. The machine’s response was to spend record sums and lose anyway. That is the story of the modern Democratic Party: deeper in debt, further left, and still convinced the next big check will fix it.
Help American Liberty PAC in our mission to elect conservatives and save our nation. Support – American Liberty PAC