Commentary

The Feds Just Grabbed Swalwell’s Phone and Laptop – Here’s What They’re Hunting

Posted on by Bill McCarthy

Federal agents stopped former California Congressman Eric Swalwell at San Francisco International Airport over the weekend, served him a search warrant, and walked off with his iPhone and MacBook Pro. The next day they hit his Washington residence. This is not a fishing expedition. It is a targeted seizure in an active federal criminal investigation into multiple allegations of sexual assault and misconduct.

The timing and method tell you the investigators believe the devices contain material evidence. Phones and laptops hold texts, photos, location data, deleted messages, and metadata that can make or break cases involving claims of non-consensual sex, intoxication, and abuse of power.

The Allegations Driving the Search

Swalwell resigned from Congress and abandoned his California governor bid in April after several women came forward. One former staffer alleged he sexually assaulted her twice while she was too intoxicated to consent. Another woman, Lonna Drewes, has publicly claimed he drugged, raped, and choked her in 2018 after offering career help. Additional women have described unsolicited nude photos and explicit messages.

These are not anonymous internet rumors. They prompted a House Ethics investigation while he was still in office and parallel criminal probes by local authorities in New York and Los Angeles. The federal piece is now moving with search warrants, which require a judge to find probable cause that evidence of a crime exists in the places and devices named.

One statute repeatedly mentioned in connection with the warrants is Title 18, Section 242. That law criminalizes the willful deprivation of constitutional rights by someone acting under color of law. It has been used against public officials who abuse their authority to commit sexual assaults. As a sitting member of Congress at the time of some of the alleged acts, Swalwell’s official position could elevate ordinary state-level claims into a federal civil-rights case.

What the Devices Are Expected to Show

Digital forensics will focus on communications between Swalwell and the accusers. Investigators will look for:

  • Text messages, direct messages, or emails that establish contact, meetings, or the nature of the relationships.
  • Photos or videos, including any that were allegedly sent unsolicited.
  • Location data and timestamps that place devices at specific addresses on the dates of alleged incidents.
  • Deleted material that recovery tools can often still retrieve.
  • Patterns across multiple women that could support claims of a course of conduct rather than isolated disputes.

If the devices contain contemporaneous messages that contradict Swalwell’s denials, or that show awareness of intoxication or lack of consent, that evidence becomes powerful. Conversely, if the records show only consensual adult interactions with no supporting digital trail for the more serious claims, the case weakens. Either way, the FBI did not seize the hardware for show. They believe it holds answers.

Separate from the sexual misconduct probe, the Trump administration recently released declassified FBI material on Swalwell’s earlier relationship with Christine Fang, a woman identified as a suspected Chinese intelligence operative. Swalwell has previously acknowledged a personal relationship and said he cut ties once informed of the concerns. The new documents reportedly include his own statements that he “occasionally hooked up” with her. That history is not the subject of the current warrants, but it underscores a pattern of high-risk personal associations that have dogged him for years.

Why This Matters

Seizing a former member of Congress’s personal electronics is a serious step. It requires judicial approval and is reserved for cases where investigators have specific reason to believe evidence of crime is stored on those devices. Swalwell has denied criminal wrongdoing. He is entitled to the presumption of innocence and to challenge any evidence that is obtained.

Yet the public interest is obvious. For years Swalwell positioned himself as a leading voice on national security and Chinese influence operations. The same period that produced the Fang relationship also produced the personal conduct now under criminal scrutiny. Digital records do not care about political branding. They either corroborate the women’s accounts or they do not.

The FBI has the phones and the computers. The forensics teams will pull the data. What they find will determine whether this remains a political embarrassment or becomes a federal criminal case under the civil-rights statute used against officials who abuse their power. The seizure itself already tells you the investigators think the truth is sitting on those devices.

Help American Liberty PAC in our mission to elect conservatives and save our nation. Support – American Liberty PAC