The Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian airbases in June 2025, targeting critical military assets, have reverberated beyond the battlefield, casting a shadow over key international arms control treaties. The operation, which damaged or destroyed dozens of strategic bombers, exposed vulnerabilities in global security frameworks and raised questions about their resilience in an era of advanced drone warfare. As the world grapples with the consequences, the fallout threatens to destabilize agreements critical to maintaining strategic balance.
The Ukrainian Operation: A Strategic Blow
On June 1, 2025, Ukraine executed a sophisticated drone attack on four Russian airbases, hitting nuclear-capable bombers such as the Tu-95 and Tu-22M3. The drones, smuggled into Russia and launched from within its borders, used autonomous navigation to evade advanced air defenses. This meticulously planned operation disrupted Russia’s long-range strike capabilities and highlighted the disruptive potential of low-cost, AI-driven drones. While a tactical success for Ukraine, the strikes have broader implications for international treaties governing nuclear and conventional arms.
Impact on International Treaties
The Ukrainian operation has strained the framework of strategic arms control, particularly the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START), which regulates U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals, including bombers. New START requires transparency, with bombers stationed at visible bases for satellite verification. Ukraine’s attack exploited this openness, targeting openly parked aircraft critical to Russia’s nuclear triad. Although Ukraine is not bound by New START, the strikes underscore the treaty’s vulnerability to asymmetric tactics like drone warfare.
Russia’s 2023 suspension of New START inspections already weakened the treaty’s verification regime. The Ukrainian strikes may deepen Moscow’s distrust, potentially leading to further withdrawal or demands for renegotiation. Such moves could unravel the treaty, increasing the risk of an unchecked nuclear arms race. The loss of transparency and mutual accountability could also embolden other nuclear powers to skirt similar agreements, threatening global stability.
Beyond New START, the attack challenges broader international norms. The use of autonomous drones to strike deep within a sovereign state raises questions about the laws of armed conflict, including principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter. While Ukraine’s actions align with its right to self-defense, the precedent of targeting strategic assets with autonomous systems could erode norms governing state sovereignty and the use of force, complicating future diplomatic efforts to regulate emerging technologies.
Broader Strategic Implications
The strikes highlight the growing challenge of integrating autonomous weapons into existing arms control frameworks. Drones, with their affordability and scalability, evade traditional deterrence models, which rely on high-cost, visible assets like bombers or missiles. This shift could prompt states to reconsider commitments to treaties that assume conventional military paradigms. For instance, agreements limiting conventional forces in Europe may become less relevant as nations prioritize investments in drone technology, potentially destabilizing regional security arrangements.
The operation also underscores the difficulty of regulating autonomous systems. Unlike manned aircraft, drones can be produced rapidly, deployed covertly, and operated without real-time human control, making them hard to track or verify under existing treaties. This gap could fuel calls for new international agreements to govern autonomous weapons, though achieving consensus amid current geopolitical tensions remains challenging.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s drone strikes on Russian airbases in June 2025 have exposed critical vulnerabilities in international arms control treaties. By targeting strategic bombers, the operation exploited the transparency required by New START, raising doubts about its viability in an era of autonomous warfare. The broader challenge to norms governing state sovereignty and the use of force could further erode global security frameworks. As drone technology reshapes warfare, the international community faces an urgent need to adapt treaties to address these emerging threats. Failure to do so risks undermining decades of arms control progress, leaving the world more vulnerable to escalation and instability.
Help American Liberty PAC in our mission to elect conservatives and save our nation. Support – American Liberty PAC