The ballots from last week’s midterm elections are still being counted in a few places, yet Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has already moved on to the business of settling scores. Democrats captured both the House and the Senate in the November 3 voting, giving them control of Congress for the first time in years. Most Americans who voted for them expected something practical about the cost of food, rent, and gasoline. Instead, the most prominent progressive voice in the party spent the days after the victory talking about investigations, subpoenas, and the possibility of impeaching Supreme Court justices.
She Named the Court in the Same Breath as the President
Speaking with a television reporter on Capitol Hill, Ocasio-Cortez said there were “so many criminals in this administration” that it was hard to decide where to begin. She promised “many, many, many investigations” and “many subpoenas,” adding that lawmakers should “follow wherever the evidence takes us.” When asked whether that list included President Trump himself, she answered that “all options are on the table.” She then turned to the Supreme Court and claimed the justices had “legalized a lot of his criminality.” She left the clear impression that the Court itself could be next.
This was not a casual remark. Ocasio-Cortez has long treated the Court’s conservative majority as an obstacle to be removed rather than a co-equal branch to be respected. In July 2024 she introduced formal articles of impeachment against Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. Those papers went nowhere while Republicans held the House. Now that her party will control the chamber starting in January, she is signaling that the earlier effort was only a rehearsal.
The Constitution Sets a Higher Bar Than the Headlines
Impeaching a justice requires a simple majority in the House, which the new Democratic majority will almost certainly possess. Removing one requires a two-thirds vote in the Senate. Democrats are projected to hold roughly 55 seats once the remaining races are settled. That is well short of the 67 votes needed for conviction. In the entire history of the republic, only one Supreme Court justice has ever been impeached: Samuel Chase in 1804. The Senate acquitted him the following year and he remained on the bench. Nothing in the record suggests the current Court has committed the kind of high crimes that would change that arithmetic.
Incoming House Republican leader Jim Jordan has already predicted that the new majority will pursue a third impeachment of President Trump and will “go after everyone in the Cabinet.” The early comments from Ocasio-Cortez make that forecast look less like partisan speculation and more like an accurate reading of progressive priorities.
Voters Talked About Prices; the Loudest Voices Talked About Power
Polling after the election showed that Democratic voters themselves want the party to focus first on the cost of living. A survey of Democratic midterm voters found that two-thirds now believe progressives strengthen the party, a sharp jump from before Election Day. Among Democrats nationally, Ocasio-Cortez herself holds a strongly positive rating, with roughly 69 percent viewing her favorably. That internal popularity gives her leverage. Party leaders have spoken about restoring health-care subsidies and addressing grocery and housing costs. The progressive wing, however, is already framing the next two years around investigations and removals.
The practical result is that a congresswoman who has never been responsible for governing a chamber is setting the tone before the new members have even taken the oath. The House will have a large Democratic majority, perhaps in the neighborhood of 250 to 256 seats. That is enough to pass messaging bills and launch committee inquiries. It is not enough to remove justices or a president without Republican votes that will not appear. The mismatch between what is possible and what is being promised is already visible.
The Tail Is Wagging Before the Dog Has Even Walked In
Ocasio-Cortez is not the incoming Speaker, nor is she the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee. She is, however, the clearest voice of the progressive left at the precise moment when that wing feels vindicated by the midterm results. Her willingness to name the Supreme Court as a potential target, before the new Congress has organized a single committee, tells ordinary voters where the energy will go. Affordability may appear in the press releases. The hearings, the subpoenas, and the articles of impeachment will occupy the calendar.
The country has seen this pattern before. After previous midterm gains, the loudest demands came from those least interested in the everyday concerns that actually moved votes. This time the demands arrived before the gavel was even handed over. Whether the rest of the new majority follows that lead or quietly steers toward legislation that lowers costs will decide whether the victory lasts past the next election cycle. For now, one member has made clear that she intends to keep the focus on who can be investigated and who can be removed. The voters who wanted relief at the checkout counter will have to wait and see whether anyone else in the majority has a different list.
Help American Liberty PAC in our mission to elect conservatives and save our nation. Support – American Liberty PAC