A criminal trial has one job. Did she do it with a mind the law still counts as responsible, or did she not. That is the whole form. Lindsay Clancy strangled Cora, five, Dawson, three, and Callan, eight months, with exercise bands in the basement on January 24, 2023, then went out a window. She does not deny the acts. Plymouth asked twelve people whether postpartum psychosis erased the crime. Eleven said yes. One said the bodies still counted. Mistrial, September 4.
What we learned after the door opened is not a secret diary from the jury room. It is a press tour. And the tour is the tell.
They Said the Quiet Part After the Camera Found Them
Roni Carlson, retired teacher, forewoman: she started signing the not-guilty-by-insanity sheets when the holdout allowed he had doubt. She was excited. Then he said he still would not sign that verdict. She has since said she was “so sad” they could not come up with a verdict for Lindsay. Not for Cora. For Lindsay. “Everything proved that she loved her children, so she had to have snapped.” That is not an instruction from the bench. That is a story. Love plus tragedy equals a medical ending. The law does not write that equation. They did.
Kellie Farina, the chef: the holdout “had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.” Correct. That is the fact the rest of the country is not allowed to get off either. They read him the definition of reasonable doubt until they were walking the room. He asked for the judge to read it again. They said no, we have it in front of us. Unanimity is not a study hall where eleven tutors flunk the twelfth for noticing the basement.
Paula Devlin, defense contractor, the one who kept talking: arrogant. Disregarded the nurses on the panel who interpreted the tox screens. Mid-deliberation they watched a hospital video never played in open court and decided it proved “altruistic filicide.” Then, this week, the sentence that should have ended the debate about whether this was only evidence. She said they knew they had a chance to get a conversation started that could change something — that could maybe stop this from ever happening again. Women’s mental health. Make it better for other women. When someone called that bias, she answered that only women deliver babies and only women get postpartum psychosis, so noticing that is not bias. It is a fact.
A fact about biology is not a verdict about three children. A conversation for other women is a campaign. Campaigns belong on a stage. They do not belong in a room that is supposed to be deaf to the stage.
Lindsay Clancy juror says the mostly-female jury viewed the case as an important opportunity to advance feminism: “We knew that this was a turning point, and this would be something that could change something to make it better for other women…” pic.twitter.com/YYwFXK6vh0
— TheBlaze (@theblaze) September 14, 2026
How Badly Is Not a Mystery
They tried to bounce the holdout. The defense asked the judge to treat disagreement as law-breaking. The judge said no. The state’s high court said no. Then the same jurors walked onto television and described the man who would not join as the problem, not the three small bodies. The lawyer called him a thief of seven weeks and hoped he slept. The eleven became “so beautiful, so wonderful.” The one became an agenda.
Names were sealed for two weeks. They did not wait. Hour-long sit-downs. Network mornings. A digital interview in Whitman where the mission statement finally lost its costume. We had a chance to start a conversation. That is not how you describe a finding of fact. That is how you describe a cause.
None of them had to say the word feminist. The structure is the same. The defendant is a vessel. The kids are context. The holdout is a man who would not get with the program. Reasonable doubt is a pamphlet you highlight at him until he signs. When he will not sign, you take the pamphlet to a reporter.
The other side of the door still exists. A fourth juror told a different station the majority was locked from the start and the holdout was not the only person who refused to move. Nick Dargie said the holdout acted out a killing with a band and a bottle, scrolled a phone, would not produce a counter-exhibit — “not a game of Clue.” Ugly if true. Still not a license for eleven people to treat murder as a seminar on maternal care. The district attorney has not announced a retrial. Status date is September 29. The charges are still murder. She is still in the state hospital. The children are still dead.
What a Jury Is For
Postpartum psychosis is real. Women have been failed. A second jury may land on insanity. None of that converts a deliberation into a listening session for a movement. The moment you say the case is how you start a national conversation, you have admitted the kids were the occasion, not the subject.
They acted badly in the way people act badly when they are sure they are good. They pre-signed. They diagnosed from the box. They outsourced medicine to the nurses in the room instead of the witnesses on the stand. They punished the one person who would not trade three homicides for a better discourse about women. Then they booked the hits.
That is an agenda. It does not need a manifesto. It needs a camera and a sentence about other women. The assignment was guilt or the legal absence of it. They turned it into a cause. The holdout, whatever else he is, remembered the assignment. The cameras remembered the cause. Only one of those is what a criminal court is for.
Help American Liberty PAC in our mission to elect conservatives and save our nation. Support – American Liberty PAC