Exactly zero people are having to flee because of your fraudulent climate crisis.
It’s all a scam. #ClimateScam https://t.co/ku52d9wxYB
— Tom Nelson (@tan123) January 27, 2023
Do they only ever lie?
Not the 1st time you’ve tried to con the public eh Greta 😉 pic.twitter.com/kOTwXmytky
— Phil Coates 🇬🇧 🚜 (@PhilCoates9) January 24, 2023
These are first class accommodations on Deutsche Bahn’s Intercity Express (ICE), where Greta Thunberg actually sat and was attended to by staff.
Meanwhile, (see photo) Greta wants us to believe she sat on the floor, like a cash-strapped, backpacking student! She’s a shyster. pic.twitter.com/s51DawX0N3— Jan – Down Under (@JanHC_inOz) January 25, 2023
Pesky plants are messing with their numbers!
“He said the carbon dioxide released by plants every year was now estimated to be about 10 to 11 times the emissions from human activities, rather than the previous estimate of five to eight times.”
Does this sound like settled science to you? #climatehttps://t.co/uF4BojS14e
— Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki (@MatthewWielicki) January 1, 2023
We’re still average!
I’m struggling to see a climate crisis here.
Perhaps a climate “scientist” can help?#ClimateScam #ClimateEmergency pic.twitter.com/qkhkeGQID2— DonKeiller (@KeillerDon) January 1, 2023
Average daily maximum temperatures in the US during 2022 were just about average since 1895, and down almost three degrees since 1934.#ClimateScam pic.twitter.com/zDlCFGcroB
— Tony Heller (@TonyClimate) January 1, 2023
Nuclear FTW
Nuclear costs 🔽with ⬆️capacity.
In the ’60s, 🇺🇸 costs were down 23% with each doubling of capacity.
If the US invests ~$1 trillion into nuclear by 2050, it would supply 85% of US energy consumption.
Costs per MWh would be down 60% also.#Uraniumhttps://t.co/MKTZiWLTEq
— CarbonCredits.com (@CarbonCredits) January 16, 2023