And Taxpayers Are Finally Getting a Break
President Trump proposed gutting foreign aid and walking away from bloated international organizations that have long treated American taxpayers as an open ATM. The plan was straightforward: slash spending that does not clearly advance U.S. interests, zero out contributions to dysfunctional UN bodies, and stop subsidizing globalist priorities that often work against American values. The results so far show real cuts are happening, even if Congress has softened some of the deepest reductions. Billions that used to flow overseas are staying home.
In July 2026, the Trump administration has secured over $1B in UN budget cuts, reduced peacekeeping operations, and withdrawn from multiple agencies as part of reforms, though full $2B cutoff claims and total UN collapse are not verified in recent reporting. pic.twitter.com/Zh0ovOXxlt
— Debra Reinhardt (@debraregypt) July 25, 2026
The Scale of the Proposed and Actual Cuts
The administration requested roughly $31 billion in new budget authority for State Department and foreign operations accounts for fiscal 2026 — a more than 40 percent reduction from prior levels. When paired with proposed rescissions of previously appropriated money, the effective cut was far steeper. Specific targets included eliminating or deeply cutting UN peacekeeping contributions, slashing the UN regular budget contribution by over 80 percent, and reducing global health programs by around 60 percent, including zeroing out certain family planning, nutrition, and related accounts.
Actual spending has already plunged. In fiscal 2025 the United States disbursed about $47 billion in foreign aid — roughly $26 billion less than the year before and the lowest inflation-adjusted level in two decades. Through the first three-quarters of fiscal 2026, disbursements stood at under $7 billion. That is a dramatic drop from the $70-plus billion range of recent peak years. Foreign aid as a share of the federal budget has collapsed to a fraction of prior levels.
Who Is Losing the Money
UN agencies and related multilateral organizations have taken the biggest hits. The United States has withdrawn from or defunded multiple UN entities and offices, including those focused on certain human rights, population, and specialized agendas. Peacekeeping contributions were targeted for elimination or severe reduction. Regular budget support was proposed for an 80-plus percent cut. Specific programs dealing with reproductive health, certain humanitarian accounts, and non-strategic development aid have seen funding eliminated or sharply reduced.
Bilateral aid has been redirected toward clear national-interest priorities. Traditional security partners such as Israel continue to receive substantial military assistance. Many lower-priority recipients and open-ended development programs have been scaled back or ended. The administration has also moved to strip funding that advanced progressive social agendas overseas.
.@elonmusk says zero people died from DOGE cuts to USAID. The billionaire CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, in his own words, helped feed the policy to the woodchipper last year, when he was the head of America’s Department of Government Efficiency. In an exclusive interview, @zannymb,… pic.twitter.com/BilkbWrJHF
— The Economist (@TheEconomist) July 23, 2026
Will the Full Cuts Stick?
Congress has pushed back. Lawmakers ultimately appropriated significantly more than the administration requested for fiscal 2026 — closer to $50 billion in the relevant accounts — preserving more funding for global health, some UN contributions, and other programs. Institutional inertia and residual bipartisan support for the foreign-aid complex remain real obstacles. Yet the direction is unmistakable. Disbursements are already far lower. The executive branch controls significant levers through rescissions, apportionment, and membership decisions. Further withdrawals from international organizations and continued pressure on appropriations are likely.
The savings are already measurable in the tens of billions relative to the high-water marks of the previous administration. Every dollar not sent to ineffective UN bureaucracies or non-strategic recipients is a dollar that cannot be wasted on agendas hostile to American interests. Trump’s proposal is not theoretical. The cuts are happening. The only question is how deep they ultimately go. Taxpayers should hope the answer is: deeper still.
Help American Liberty PAC in our mission to elect conservatives and save our nation. Support – American Liberty PAC