Commentary

Two Former NBA Players Just Forced the Question the WNBA Refuses to Answer

Posted on by Bill McCarthy

Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White, both former first-round NBA picks, publicly declared themselves eligible for the 2027 WNBA draft. They stated they identify as women—or, in White’s case, that he identifies as a woman for the purposes of professional basketball. A third former player, Larry Sanders, later followed with a similar declaration. Their move is an explicit test of the league’s rules and its years of progressive posturing on gender.

The Stunt and the Rules

The WNBA’s collective bargaining agreement says only “players who are women” are eligible. It stops there. There is no public policy defining woman by biology, chromosomes, or sex recorded at birth. The league has never had a transgender woman—meaning a biological male—on a roster. It has had players born female who later identified as nonbinary. That distinction matters, and the league has avoided drawing it clearly.

Freedom and White pointed directly at the gap. If self-identification is enough, they argued, then they qualify. Freedom said he had reviewed the guidelines and met every requirement under an inclusion standard. White said he wanted the parameters spelled out—wig, voice, surgery, or simply a declaration—and threatened legal action if blocked. Both framed the declarations as a consistency test rather than a genuine career plan. The physical reality is obvious: Freedom is 6-foot-10 and roughly 250 pounds; White is 6-foot-8 and 260. In a women’s league those size and strength advantages are decisive.

The League’s Response

The WNBA formed a task force of team presidents and general managers to discuss transgender eligibility. It produced no new rules. A league statement denounced “bad-faith efforts” to demean or marginalize others and insisted there were no immediate eligibility matters. Commissioner Cathy Engelbert had already described the topic as complex and nuanced. The players’ union emphasized that athletes would not be used as political pawns and stressed inclusion.

None of this answers the core question. The league continues to celebrate progressive gender ideology in its messaging, coaching staffs, and public statements. Coaches have worn shirts affirming “trans kids belong.” The organization has aligned itself with every major left cultural cause. Yet when biological males declare they meet the only written standard—“women”—the response is process, task forces, and accusations of bad faith rather than a clear biological line.

Will This Force a Definition?

It forces the contradiction into the open. It does not force a resolution that prioritizes women’s sports. Defining woman by sex would protect the category the league claims to exist for. It would also collide with the ideological commitments the WNBA has already made. The safer institutional path is continued ambiguity, endless review, and the hope that no serious male athlete with current professional skill actually forces a roster decision.

The declarations by Freedom, White, and Sanders expose the problem without solving it. A league that cannot or will not say what a woman is has already chosen its side. The activism remains. The definition stays missing. Women’s basketball is left to absorb the consequences.

Help American Liberty PAC in our mission to elect conservatives and save our nation. Support – American Liberty PAC